Swimmer Performing Test

If you’re working with swimmers, you’re likely doing some kind of swimming performance testing on a regular basis?! (and if not you should consider starting it). Maybe you’re tracking swim times at set distances, using lactate strips poolside, or monitoring heart rate and RPE. Whatever your exact protocol, the goals are almost always the same:

  • Assess the current performance level of your swimmer
  • Monitor how that performance develops throughout the training process
  • Set training intensities that target the areas which offer the biggest room for improvement, identified by the testing you do.

That’s the foundation. But here’s the thing: swimming performance isn’t just about getting faster. It’s about understanding why a swimmer gets faster—or doesn’t. And that starts with understanding what physiologically drives performance in swimming.

Unlike a marathon, where energy is almost entirely derived from aerobic metabolism, or a 100-meter sprint, which is mostly anaerobic, swimming events nearly always sit in the middle. Whether it’s a 100m freestyle or a 400m IM, performance is powered by a mix of aerobic and anaerobic energy systems. And the tricky part? A swimmer can improve their performance by improving either one—or both.

That makes things more complicated. Because it’s not just about training hard—it’s about knowing which system to target. Focus too much on the aerobic system, and you might leave untapped anaerobic potential on the table. Focus too much on the anaerobic side, and you risk killing aerobic efficiency and long-term sustainability.

There’s another crucial factor that can’t be ignored: the swimming economy, also known as the energy cost of swimming. No matter how strong the engine, it matters how efficiently it moves through water. Swimming economy is influenced by technique, stroke mechanics, and body position. And it often plays a deciding role—especially when two swimmers have similar metabolic profiles.

Let’s align on this:

  • Testing should be more than collecting numbers—it’s about identifying what drives performance
  • Swimming performance is always a balance of aerobic, anaerobic, and swimming economy factors
  • And that balance is different for every swimmer

So before diving into 3 advanced performance testing strategies, lets watch the video to discover how to identify the physiological reasons behind a swimmer’s performance — including how to uncover their aerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and energy efficiency using a single smart protocol

Now, let’s take a closer look at what you can do in swim testing—that you likely don’t do yet.

Why your current performance testing might not be enough

Your performance testing in swimming might be simple and straightforward: swim a few set distances at maximum speed. And honestly—there’s a lot to like about that approach.

It’s close to racing, it feels sport-specific, and it’s easy to adapt the test set to the athlete’s target race distances. Best of all, it gives you one clear outcome: how fast is the swimmer? 

Based on that, you might set training intensities as a percentage of best time over a given distance and use those splits to build interval sets. It’s easy, practical, and provides excellent comparability to actual race performance.

But here’s where this approach misses the mark: it doesn’t offer any insight into the physiology behind that performance.

Fig.1: Example why looking at best time only can be misleading: two swimmers have the same time for a 200m freestyle effort. The physiological makeup of these two athletes can be vastly different. In this example the Swimmer A is stronger aerobically (VO2max), but especially anaerobically (VLamax), but has a higher energy demand aka not as good a swimming economy. Swimmer B compensates for the slightly lower VO2max, but especially the low VLamax by a much better swimming economy.

Let’s say your swimmer’s 400m time improves. That’s great—but why did it improve? Was it due to a better swimming economy? Improved aerobic capacity? Enhanced buffering ability? Increased anaerobic power? You don’t know.

Sure, you might try to guess. If the 50m time didn’t change, maybe it wasn’t anaerobic power. But even then, you can’t be sure—maybe technique improved, maybe glycolytic power did. 

You’re still in the dark.

And when do you use those best times to set training intensities? Sure, you know the swimmer can hit the times—but what physiological stimulus does that training actually produce?

You have no idea:

  • What % of VO₂max is used at a given % of best time? Unknown.
  • How much strain is placed on the anaerobic system? Unknown.
  • Is the rest in your interval set enough to clear lactate? Or will it accumulate and shut down glycolysis due to rising acidosis? Again—unknown.

So maybe you’ve moved beyond that. Maybe you’re doing some physiological testing—like lactate testing or even VO₂ measurements. That’s already a big step forward.

You might run an incremental test with lactate samples to build a lactate curve. In some setups, you might even get VO₂ data from an all-out effort and estimate the swimmer’s VO₂max.

That’s helpful. But even here, the picture remains incomplete.

  • Lactate concentration alone doesn’t tell you anything about the aerobic vs. anaerobic energy contribution.
  • VO₂ data can give you insight at submaximal speeds—but rarely at true race pace, where swimming economy really matters.
  • And what about anaerobic power or capacity? Neither your lactate test nor your VO₂ data will tell you that.

Also, most incremental protocols don’t include true all-out efforts—so you miss out on data from the high-intensity end of the performance spectrum. If you want that information, you need to add separate time-trials or sprint tests, which many coaches don’t.

Lactate Profile Graph from Swimm Test
Fig. 2: Influence of a higher glycolytic power (VLamax) on the lactate curve. The higher VLamax (red curve) results in higher lactate production rates at sub-maximum swimming speed and therefore creates a higher lactate concentration, which causes the lactate profile curve shift to the left. Without a deeper understanding of the factors which influence the lactate profile curve - such as VLamax, VO2max, body composition – this left shift of the curve due to better anaerobic power cannot be distinguished from a decreased VO2max.

Then there’s the issue of training zones. When using lactate data, you might switch from % of best time to zones based on % of lactate threshold—or worse, fixed lactate values (e.g., 2 mmol/L or 4 mmol/L). But think about this: if your lactate test involved 200m or 400m intervals, the data you get only reflect lactate dynamics at that specific distance.

That means you’re blind when it comes to other distances. You can’t easily extrapolate to 50m, 100m, 600m, or 800m. And that’s a problem—because most swim training involves a mix of distances, each with different metabolic demands.

In short

Your current performance testing might be giving you some answers—but it’s also leaving a lot of important questions unanswered. Whether you’re using race-pace time trials, lactate step tests, or even VO₂ equipment, there’s a good chance you’re missing the full picture.

That’s exactly why we’re going to look at three powerful upgrades you can implement in your testing. These will help you close the gaps and finally get the insights you actually need to guide training and improve performance.

Let’s dive in.

1. Get the full metabolic profile & best times—using just one smart lactate test

What if we told you that a single lactate test—designed the right way—can give you the swimmer’s VO2max, VLamax, thresholds, and even aerobic and anaerobic energy contribution?

No expensive lab setup. No gas exchange measurements. Just blood lactate. Sounds too good to be true? It’s not.

Here’s how it works: every measured lactate value is the result of two competing processes—

  • Lactate production: how much lactate is generated by glycolysis (linked to the swimmer’s maximum anaerobic capacity, or VLamax)
  • Lactate combustion: how much lactate is cleared and oxidized by the aerobic system (linked to VO₂max)

When you measure lactate at different intensities—especially when your protocol includes both submaximal and maximal efforts—you can extract both ends of this equation. That means you’re not just collecting lactate values—you’re uncovering the swimmer’s metabolic fingerprint.

“But wait,” you might ask, “didn’t we just say submax lactate testing misses race-specific speeds and distances?”

Yes—if you use a rigid, old school, incremental-only protocol. But here’s the upgrade: you don’t have to.

In this approach here, you can mix and match efforts however you want. Want to include 2 or 3 all-out swims at different distances or even different strokes? Go for it. Working with an open water athlete who needs longer, lower-speed steps? No problem. Testing younger swimmers where 200m is already a stretch? That works too.

You design the test to fit the swimmer—not the other way around.

And despite including multiple max efforts, you’re not necessarily extending the test time. Those all-out swims need a proper warm-up anyway—so why not measure lactate during warm-up steps? Those submax efforts already contain valuable physiological information.

So what you get from this kind of protocol is:

And for the all-out efforts: you will also have the aerobic vs anaerobic energy contribution, allowing you to decipher how the swimmers body delivered the needed energy and which of the two systems offers the biggest room for improvement via training.

All from a flexible, customizable lactate test. You don’t even need to abandon or change your current protocol—unless you want to give these new opportunities.

That’s the first big shift: stop testing for lactate levels and start using lactate to uncover the whole metabolic system.

Fig. 3: Example of metrics that contain a full 360° metabolic profile in swimming. The one shown here was derived from a lactate test of 2x200m and 2x400m in breaststroke.

2. Disclose the real swimming economy—where it actually matters

If you’ve ever done VO₂ testing in swimming, you’ve probably tried to use it to calculate swimming economy. After all, it seems straightforward: measure oxygen uptake at different speeds, then look at the ratio—VO₂ per meter swum. Maybe you even convert that into energy using the caloric equivalent.

That’s a step in the right direction—but here’s the problem:

VO₂ only reflects the aerobic part of the energy equation. And in swimming—especially over short to middle distances—a significant portion of energy doesn’t come from oxygen at all.

It comes from the anaerobic system. And VO₂ measurements miss that completely.

This becomes a major problem when:

  • The event is too short for VO₂ to fully ramp up (like a 50m sprint)
  • There’s a high anaerobic contribution at race speed (which applies to nearly all race distances)
  • You’re trying to compare efforts of different intensities or durations based solely on post-exercise VO₂

Let’s look at some examples:

  • A 50m all-out front crawl might result in lower VO₂ than a 100m all-out swim (because of the short duration)—yet clearly the 50m requires more power.
  • A 200m and 400m race simulation might both result in the same VO₂max—yet the 400m is slower and demands less total power than the 200m.

So relying on VO₂ alone gives you a misleading picture—especially when you care about race-specific intensities. In other words, you’re measuring the economy where it doesn’t matter, and ignoring where it does.

Now, let’s go back to what we introduced in Upgrade #1: a protocol designed by you around your swimmer that combines submax and max efforts—and includes lactate sampling.

That’s where the magic happens.

Lactate tells the story of the anaerobic energy contribution. And when you combine that with VO₂ data (which gives you the aerobic part), you get the total energy demand—even for short, intense, anaerobically driven efforts.

That means you can now calculate:

  • True swimming economy at race pace
  • Not just VO₂ per speed, but total energy per meter swum
  • And compare that economy meaningfully—across athletes, across race types, across strokes

And here’s where it gets really practical:

  • Instead of telling an athlete they’re wasting “X ml O₂” or “Y kJ”, you can now express that difference in seconds.
  • You can show them: “With your current economy, you’re losing 0.8 seconds per 100m compared to top-level swimmers. Not because of fitness—just because of technique.”
  • That’s actionable. That’s motivational. And that makes your case for technical training much more convincing.

Worried that VO₂ testing means snorkels, flumes, restricted breathing, and lab like artificial swimming?

Not anymore!

These days, VO₂ can be measured on the pool deck—post-exercise, without interfering with technique, flip turns, or breathing rhythm. It’s affordable, non-invasive, and available where it matters most: in real swimming, with real strokes, under real conditions.

INSCYD Software Economy Chart
Fig. 4: Analysis of swimming economy aka energy cost of swimming. Each effort – independent if submaximum or all out – the energy from aerobic and anaerobic sources combined is analyzed to compute the total energy demand. The result can then be compared to either literature data of economy in swimming, or other athletes. A dropdown menu allows users to select to view either gains/losses in speed or gains/losses in oxygen demand (VO2tot) for each effort.

3. Turn metabolic data into better training—and smarter zone design

By now, we’ve seen how you can build a lactate test that fits the swimmer, not the other way around. You’ve learned that this flexible protocol can reveal a full metabolic profile—including VO2max, VLamax, thresholds, and race-pace economy.

But now comes the most important part: using that data to prescribe better training.

Earlier, we discussed that setting training intensities based purely on % of best times misses the physiology entirely. And we showed that conventional lactate profiles are limited—they only tell you what happens at the distances you tested, and they don’t reflect the actual energy systems behind performance.

So how do you bridge that gap between physiological insight and practical programming?

Enter the Training Zone Builder—a tool that acts more like a training effort configurator than a rigid zone chart.

 It does two key things:

I. Define training zones based on the athlete’s unique physiology and your interval structure

With the Training Zone Builder, you’re no longer stuck using fixed distances from a test or arbitrary thresholds. Instead, you can define zones based on:

  • A target lactate concentration after any interval distance (even if it wasn’t part of your test)
  • A % of VO₂max utilization
  • Anaerobic energy contribution
  • The training load on specific systems—like glycolytic power, aerobic capacity, or lactate clearance

Let’s say you’ve identified that your swimmer needs to improve aerobic capacity. The tool can calculate the exact speed required to hit that stimulus for a 100m or 300m interval. Want to prescribe work that pushes anaerobic lactate tolerance? Same idea—you get precise, individualized speeds based on the athlete’s own metabolic profile.

In other words: you can now build training from the physiological goal backward, not from arbitrary times forward.

II. Understand what’s going on in the athlete’s body—inside every training zone

But it doesn’t stop at prescribing effort. For every training set you define, the system can show you:

  • What % of VO₂max the athlete is working at
  • How much energy is coming from the aerobic vs. anaerobic system
  • The estimated lactate production and clearance involved
  • And the total physiological stimulus the set creates

So even if you start by using your familiar zone framework—say, based on fixed lactate values—you can gradually expand. You’ll learn more about each athlete’s response in those zones, test new set ideas, and refine your plans with real data.

What this means for you as a coach:

  • More precise training prescriptions
  • Deeper insight into how each swimmer responds to different types of work

And the confidence that your training is not just hard—but smart

Want to master these and other advanced methods?

If you’re ready to go beyond the theory and apply everything you’ve just read—Join us for 4 days of in-depth education and hands-on physiological testing designed to sharpen your coaching and testing skills. Work hands on with athletes, master nutrition strategies, and connect with a global, science-driven community—guided by the scientist and coach behind multiple Olympic champions.

Over four immersive days, you’ll:

  • Run real VO₂ and lactate tests with athletes

  • Build full metabolic profiles—including VO₂max, VLamax, and energy contributions

  • Learn how to prescribe training using real data—not guesswork

  • Connect with world-class coaches and scientists like Sebastian Weber and Parker Spencer

👉 Secure your spot now — early bird pricing ends soon, and spaces are limited.

arrow-icon-down Learn More
arrow-icon-down Secure Spot

INSCYD brings all of this to life

Everything you’ve read above isn’t theory. It’s not a wishlist for the future. It’s already here—and it’s called INSCYD.

INSCYD software allows you to:

  • Design swim testing protocols around your athletes, their distances, strokes, and goals
  • Extract a full metabolic profile from just a few well-chosen efforts using lactate—no lab or expensive VO₂ gear required (but fully compatible with VO₂ if you have it)
  • Measure true race-pace economy, by combining anaerobic and aerobic energy data
  • Use the Training Zone Builder to prescribe individualized sets based on the actual physiology of each swimmer—even across distances and intensities not covered in your original test
  • Fine-tune your training with full visibility into how each athlete responds to different training loads and effort types

Best of all, INSCYD is built on peer-reviewed science. Every model, every calculation, and every recommendation is based on validated, published research—not on AI gimmicks, not on anecdotal guesswork, and not on fuzzy “from experience we know…” statements. You get clarity and trust, not hype.

INSCYD's Scientific publication

That’s why national federations, Olympic swim teams, and elite coaches rely on INSCYD. Athletes using INSCYD have gone on to win Olympic medals, break world records, and unlock new levels of performance—because they finally had access to the right data, at the right time, in the right way.

And what if you’ve never done lactate testing before? No problem. We’ve got you covered:

  • Step-by-step eLearning courses on how to perform lactate testing
  • Personal support from our team to help you get started
  • Discounted access to the most accurate and scientifically validated lactate analyzers on the market

It’s more affordable than you might think—and once you try it, you’ll never want to go back to guessing.

Ready to begin? If you’re not yet using INSCYD, book a free demo and take the first step toward smarter testing, deeper insights, and better training—built specifically for swimming.

And if you’re an athlete, find an INSCYD-certified coach or lab to get your metabolic profile.

Get 360° View of Swimmer Performance with Detailed Metabolic Profile at Your Fingertips

Stop guessing. Start using real physiological data to individualize your swimmers training and drive consistent progress.

  • Get everything in one test — revealing the full physiological breakdown that truly drives endurance success.
  • Use the same protocols, same equipment, same process—just get 10× more insights without disrupting how you work.
  • Built on deterministic models and validated through peer-reviewed literature, our approach ensures the highest accuracy and reliability.
Book A Free Demo - See In Action

References

  1. Brooks, G. A. “Lactate: glycolytic end product and oxidative substrate during sustained exercise in mammals—the “lactate shuttle”.” Circulation, respiration, and metabolism: current comparative approaches. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985. 208-218.
  2. Rogatzki, M. J., Ferguson, B. S., Goodwin, M. L., & Gladden, L. B. (2015). Lactate is always the end product of glycolysis. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 22.
  3. Brooks, George A. “Lactate as a fulcrum of metabolism.” Redox biology 35 (2020): 101454.

Explore Other Blog Posts

View allArticlePodcastUser StoriesWebinarWhitepaper
Track running sprint

Should my Track and Field runner increase or decrease VLamax?

In our previous article about Why the best track and field running coaches look beyond VO2max, we talked about the importance of knowing your athlete’s anaerobic power (VLamax). We showed that having a too low VLamax can easily cost you more than 5 seconds in an 800m race, while a too high VLamax can cost…

Read more

MESICS VS INSCYD: Die Beste Software Für Laktat-tests

Sind Sie sich nicht sicher, welche Software Sie zur Leistungsdiagnostik in Ihrem Labor verwenden sollen? Werfen Sie einen Blick auf diesen Vergleich zwischen Mesics Winlactat (LC-Laktat) vs. INSCYD und entscheiden Sie, welches Tool am besten zu Ihrem Laktat- und/oder Spiroergometrie-Diagnostiklabor passt. Um Verwirrungen zu vermeiden: Mesics ist der Firmenname. Ihr Produkt heißt Winlactat. Bald wird…

Read more
Interval Training Fails

Why You Don’t get faster Threshold Intervals— And How Physiology Based Training can Fix it for You

For nearly two decades, many endurance coaches have relied on Functional Threshold Power (FTP) as the main tool for setting training intensities and measuring progress. This approach, originally intended to approximate the maximal lactate steady state (anaerobic threshold), caught on largely because establishing FTP doesn’t require laboratory-based lactate or gas-exchange testing—just a straightforward field assessment.…

Read more
INSCYD user Sarah Gigante

Use case: becoming National TT Champion using INSCYD

,

In this blog, Sport Scientist Dylan Lindsey shares how he coached Sarah Gigante towards the National TT Championships. He specifically dives into the benefits of using the Lactate: Recovery & Accumulation graph. Ready to learn how to become a national TT champion? Let’s start! Sarah Gigante: National TT Champion 2021 After a long hiatus from…

Read more